GUATE/XRP
58safety: ModerateAMM account rsJsvv…uYnE · issuer rKTG86…WJrU · guatemoneda.com
Under $50k locked: high slippage on entry and exit.
Inside the GUATE/XRP pool
The GUATE/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding GUATE against XRP at the AMM account rsJsvvm2…uYnE. It currently holds $25.3k of liquidity (about 17.1K XRP across both sides) and charges a 0.000% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 39 days.
Our scoring reads as fair: it functions, but the numbers behind it are modest enough that exits can be slow, producing a health score of 45/100, while the underlying GUATE issuer carries a safety score of 58/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.
Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $3.5k across 79 swaps, a turnover of 13.7% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 0.00% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 3 providers, with the largest holding 34.4% of the LP tokens.
Why this score?
This pool reads moderate on safety (58/100) and low on health (45/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.
Pool health — 45/100 · Low
Strongest area: organic trading activity. Weakest: structural resilience.
- Liquidity depth & stability48
- Organic trading activity54
- LP distribution40
- Asset quality64
- Age & track record49
- Fee sustainability29
- Volatility / IL risk58
- Structural resilience19
What helps this score
- +Liquidity has held steady, with no large withdrawals in the tracked window.
- +Trades nearly every day — activity looks organic, not a one-off spike.
- +The issuer is blackholed — supply and settings are locked forever.
- +Freeze is permanently disabled, so your LP position cannot be frozen.
What holds it down
- −A modest $5,000 trade would move this pool's price sharply.
- −Under $50k of liquidity: slippage on entry and exit is high.
Earnings activity
Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.
Est. fee APY (7D)
0.00%
(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1
Est. fee APY (24H)
0.00%
Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.
Turnover (24h)
13.7%
Activity
Steady daily volume and swaps — meaningful activity by XRPL standards.
Recent daily volume
Last 15 days
Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.
Fee income breakdown
- 24h volume
- $3.5k
- Fee rate
- 0.000%
- Fees to LPs (24h)
- $0
- Fees to LPs (7d)
- $0
Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.
Pool size
$25.3k
24h volume
$3.5k
24h volume / size
13.7%
Trading fee
0.000%
Top LP share
34.4%
Pool age
39 days
Score breakdown
Issuer control
weight 26% · risk 12/100- Issuer is blackholed — no new tokens can be minted and settings cannot be changed.
- The issuing key is burned, so no freeze can ever be signed.
Issuer quality & transparency
weight 15% · risk 42/100- The issuer publishes guatemoneda.com, which looks project-owned but belongs to a team we cannot independently identify.
Liquidity quality
weight 14% · risk 51/100- Roughly $25k of value is locked in this pool.
- Thin liquidity: even a modest trade moves the price a lot, and exiting is costly.
- Volume is a healthy fraction of the pool's size — the liquidity is genuinely being used.
LP distribution
weight 16% · risk 54/100- The largest liquidity provider controls 34.4% of the pool, the top five control 100.0%.
- 3 addresses hold LP tokens.
Track record & longevity
weight 13% · risk 89/100- Pool has existed for about 39 days.
Verification & signals
weight 7% · risk 32/100- guatemoneda.com is published on-ledger and can be cross-checked against the project's xrp-ledger.toml.
Risk history & behaviour
weight 6% · risk 8/100- No aggressive issuer powers remain, and none have been used.
Pair / impermanent loss
weight 3% · risk 70/100- A volatile token paired with XRP: large price moves in either direction cause impermanent loss.
Impermanent loss & slippage calculator
Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.
Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.
Historical fee income of 0.00% divided by this pool's ×2 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of -5.72%. Based on past volume, not a projection.
At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $0 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly −$57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.
Estimated price impact: 7.34%
Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.
Where to go next
Impermanent loss, worked
Three scenarios showing what a 25%, 100% and 300% price move actually costs.
Open →How AMM pools pay
Fees, depth, turnover and what separates a healthy pool from a fragile one.
Open →Check the token first
Look up GUATE's issuer permissions and supply concentration before providing liquidity.
Open →Compare all pools
Health scores, fee income and LP concentration across every XRP-paired AMM we track.
Open →Learning path
Stage ten covers AMM pools step by step, with the checks to run before depositing.
Open →CampXRP blog
Written guides on tokens, liquidity pools, risk and security.
Open →Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.