USD/XRP
US Dollar82safety: ExcellentAMM account rs9ine…Ah3Q · issuer rhub8V…F3wq
Under $50k locked: high slippage on entry and exit.
Inside the USD/XRP pool
The USD/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding USD against XRP at the AMM account rs9ineLq…Ah3Q. It currently holds $25.7k of liquidity (about 17.4K XRP across both sides) and charges a 0.462% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 906 days.
Our scoring reads as a strong pool, with dependable depth and steady trading, producing a health score of 68/100, while the underlying USD issuer carries a safety score of 82/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.
Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $1.3k across 222 swaps, a turnover of 4.9% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 4.37% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 164 providers, with the largest holding 16.7% of the LP tokens.
Why this score?
This pool reads excellent on safety (82/100) and healthy on health (68/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.
Pool health — 68/100 · Healthy
Strongest area: asset quality. Weakest: structural resilience.
- Liquidity depth & stability56
- Organic trading activity51
- LP distribution90
- Asset quality90
- Age & track record100
- Fee sustainability79
- Volatility / IL risk94
- Structural resilience24
What helps this score
- +Liquidity has held steady, with no large withdrawals in the tracked window.
- +Trades nearly every day — activity looks organic, not a one-off spike.
- +Liquidity is spread across many wallets, with no single dominant provider.
- +The paired token itself scores well on issuer safety.
- +Has survived more than six months on the ledger.
- +A publicly identified, supervised issuer stands behind the token side.
- +No single liquidity provider dominates the pool.
- +A long, continuous pool history with no break in liquidity.
- +A stable-style pair keeps impermanent loss small.
What holds it down
- −A modest $5,000 trade would move this pool's price sharply.
- −Under $50k of liquidity: slippage on entry and exit is high.
Earnings activity
Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.
Est. fee APY (7D)
4.37%
(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1
Est. fee APY (24H)
8.63%
Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.
Turnover (24h)
4.9%
Activity
A little trading: some daily volume, but thin and easily disrupted.
Recent daily volume
Last 15 days
Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.
Fee income breakdown
- 24h volume
- $1.3k
- Fee rate
- 0.462%
- Fees to LPs (24h)
- $6
- Fees to LPs (7d)
- $21
Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.
Pool size
$25.7k
24h volume
$1.3k
24h volume / size
4.9%
Trading fee
0.462%
Top LP share
16.7%
Pool age
906 days
Score breakdown
Issuer control
weight 26% · risk 17/100- GateHub — Regulated European gateway issuing redeemable fiat IOUs; issuer control is part of the redemption model.
- Issuer keeps mint, freeze and clawback powers, as a redeemable regulated asset requires.
Issuer quality & transparency
weight 15% · risk 5/100- GateHub is publicly identified and supervised.
Liquidity quality
weight 14% · risk 57/100- Roughly $26k of value is locked in this pool.
- Thin liquidity: even a modest trade moves the price a lot, and exiting is costly.
LP distribution
weight 16% · risk 22/100- The largest liquidity provider controls 16.7% of the pool, the top five control 50.6%.
- 164 addresses hold LP tokens.
- A broad set of providers makes a sudden liquidity exit far less likely.
- Liquidity is well spread across providers.
Track record & longevity
weight 13% · risk 0/100- Pool has existed for about 906 days.
- A long, continuous history is a meaningful positive signal.
Verification & signals
weight 7% · risk 3/100- Issuer identity is publicly verifiable and supervised.
Risk history & behaviour
weight 6% · risk 9/100- Freeze has not been given up, so the power is available even though it has not been used.
Pair / impermanent loss
weight 3% · risk 20/100- XRP paired with a stable-style asset: price ratios move less, so impermanent loss stays small.
Impermanent loss & slippage calculator
Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.
Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.
Historical fee income of 4.37% divided by this pool's ×2 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of -3.53%. Based on past volume, not a projection.
At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $0 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly −$57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.
Estimated price impact: 7.21%
Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.
Where to go next
Impermanent loss, worked
Three scenarios showing what a 25%, 100% and 300% price move actually costs.
Open →How AMM pools pay
Fees, depth, turnover and what separates a healthy pool from a fragile one.
Open →Check the token first
Look up USD's issuer permissions and supply concentration before providing liquidity.
Open →Compare all pools
Health scores, fee income and LP concentration across every XRP-paired AMM we track.
Open →Learning path
Stage ten covers AMM pools step by step, with the checks to run before depositing.
Open →CampXRP blog
Written guides on tokens, liquidity pools, risk and security.
Open →Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.