rCODE/XRP
43safety: RiskyAMM account racQ2T…Cg5F · issuer rPP4z4…gfCT · royalcode-xrpl-toml.old-grass-0f81.workers.dev
The issuer still controls the token account and can mint more supply or change its settings.
Trust lines can be frozen by the issuer, which also freezes your LP position.
A single provider holds more than 40% of the pool and can exit at any time.
Inside the rCODE/XRP pool
The rCODE/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding rCODE against XRP at the AMM account racQ2Tfi…Cg5F. It currently holds $296.0k of liquidity (about 215.9K XRP across both sides) and charges a 0.500% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 86 days.
Our scoring reads as fair: it functions, but the numbers behind it are modest enough that exits can be slow, producing a health score of 33/100, while the underlying rCODE issuer carries a safety score of 43/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.
Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $2.3k across 7 swaps, a turnover of 0.8% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 0.32% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 4 providers, with the largest holding 100.0% of the LP tokens — if that provider withdraws, the depth you see today largely disappears.
Why this score?
This pool reads risky on safety (43/100) and low on health (33/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.
Pool health — 33/100 · Low
Health is capped by unresolved red flags on this pool.
- Liquidity depth & stability79
- Organic trading activity21
- LP distribution9
- Asset quality52
- Age & track record63
- Fee sustainability71
- Volatility / IL risk58
- Structural resilience87
What helps this score
- +Deep liquidity — large enough to absorb normal trade sizes.
- +Liquidity has held steady, with no large withdrawals in the tracked window.
- +Trades nearly every day — activity looks organic, not a one-off spike.
- +Deep liquidity keeps slippage low on ordinary trade sizes.
What holds it down
- −1 unresolved critical red flag caps how healthy this pool can read.
- −Volume is dominated by isolated spikes rather than steady flow.
- −One provider holds almost the entire pool and can withdraw it at will.
- −The issuer is not blackholed and can still mint supply or change settings.
- −One provider holds 100% of the pool and can exit at will.
Earnings activity
Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.
Est. fee APY (7D)
0.32%
(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1
Est. fee APY (24H)
1.40%
Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.
Turnover (24h)
0.8%
Activity
A little trading: some daily volume, but thin and easily disrupted.
Recent daily volume
Last 15 days
Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.
Fee income breakdown
- 24h volume
- $2.3k
- Fee rate
- 0.500%
- Fees to LPs (24h)
- $11
- Fees to LPs (7d)
- $18
Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.
Pool size
$296.0k
24h volume
$2.3k
24h volume / size
0.8%
Trading fee
0.500%
Top LP share
100.0%
Pool age
86 days
Score breakdown
Issuer control
weight 26% · risk 57/100- Issuer account is still controlled by its owner: supply and settings can change at any time.
- Issuer can freeze trust lines. A freeze also freezes the matching LP tokens.
Issuer quality & transparency
weight 15% · risk 42/100- The issuer publishes royalcode-xrpl-toml.old-grass-0f81.workers.dev, which looks project-owned but belongs to a team we cannot independently identify.
Liquidity quality
weight 14% · risk 31/100- Roughly $296k of value is locked in this pool.
- Deep enough that ordinary trade sizes cause limited slippage.
LP distribution
weight 16% · risk 100/100- The largest liquidity provider controls 100.0% of the pool, the top five control 100.0%.
- 4 addresses hold LP tokens.
- One provider can exit and drain most of the liquidity without warning.
Track record & longevity
weight 13% · risk 77/100- Pool has existed for about 86 days.
Verification & signals
weight 7% · risk 32/100- royalcode-xrpl-toml.old-grass-0f81.workers.dev is published on-ledger and can be cross-checked against the project's xrp-ledger.toml.
Risk history & behaviour
weight 6% · risk 16/100- Freeze has not been given up, so the power is available even though it has not been used.
Pair / impermanent loss
weight 3% · risk 70/100- A volatile token paired with XRP: large price moves in either direction cause impermanent loss.
Impermanent loss & slippage calculator
Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.
Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.
Historical fee income of 0.32% divided by this pool's ×5.85 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of -5.67%. Based on past volume, not a projection.
At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $0 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly −$57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.
Estimated price impact: 0.67%
Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.
Where to go next
Impermanent loss, worked
Three scenarios showing what a 25%, 100% and 300% price move actually costs.
Open →How AMM pools pay
Fees, depth, turnover and what separates a healthy pool from a fragile one.
Open →Check the token first
Look up rCODE's issuer permissions and supply concentration before providing liquidity.
Open →Compare all pools
Health scores, fee income and LP concentration across every XRP-paired AMM we track.
Open →Learning path
Stage ten covers AMM pools step by step, with the checks to run before depositing.
Open →CampXRP blog
Written guides on tokens, liquidity pools, risk and security.
Open →Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.