← All pools

XRG/XRP

70safety: Strong

AMM account rNiykR…qXAC · issuer rUo5UN…k5Dp · xgreen.energy

Dominant LPrisk multiplier ×1.8

A single provider holds more than 40% of the pool and can exit at any time.

Inside the XRG/XRP pool

The XRG/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding XRG against XRP at the AMM account rNiykRMW…qXAC. It currently holds $93.1k of liquidity (about 67.9K XRP across both sides) and charges a 1.000% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 570 days.

Our scoring reads as a workable pool, though at least one of depth, activity or provider spread is thinner than ideal, producing a health score of 59/100, while the underlying XRG issuer carries a safety score of 70/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.

Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $1 across 3 swaps, a turnover of 0.0% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 0.21% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 524 providers, with the largest holding 50.2% of the LP tokens.

Why this score?

This pool reads strong on safety (70/100) and fair on health (59/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.

Pool health — 59/100 · Fair

Strongest area: liquidity depth & stability. Weakest: organic trading activity.

  • Liquidity depth & stability68
  • Organic trading activity19
  • LP distribution73
  • Asset quality75
  • Age & track record97
  • Fee sustainability71
  • Volatility / IL risk64
  • Structural resilience64

What helps this score

  • +Liquidity has held steady, with no large withdrawals in the tracked window.
  • +Trades nearly every day — activity looks organic, not a one-off spike.
  • +The paired token itself scores well on issuer safety.
  • +Has survived more than six months on the ledger.
  • +The issuer is blackholed — supply and settings are locked forever.
  • +Freeze is permanently disabled, so your LP position cannot be frozen.
  • +A long, continuous pool history with no break in liquidity.

What holds it down

  • Volume is dominated by isolated spikes rather than steady flow.
  • One provider holds 50% of the pool and can exit at will.

Earnings activity

Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.

Est. fee APY (7D)

0.21%

(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1

Est. fee APY (24H)

0.00%

Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.

Turnover (24h)

0.0%

Activity

InactiveRising

Almost nothing traded here in the last day — fee income is near zero.

Recent daily volume

Last 15 days

15 days agotoday

Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.

Fee income breakdown

24h volume
$1
Fee rate
1.000%
Fees to LPs (24h)
$0
Fees to LPs (7d)
$4

Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.

Pool size

$93.1k

24h volume

$1

24h volume / size

0.0%

Trading fee

1.000%

Top LP share

50.2%

Pool age

570 days

Score breakdown

Issuer control

weight 26% · risk 12/100
  • Issuer is blackholed — no new tokens can be minted and settings cannot be changed.
  • The issuing key is burned, so no freeze can ever be signed.

Issuer quality & transparency

weight 15% · risk 42/100
  • The issuer publishes xgreen.energy, which looks project-owned but belongs to a team we cannot independently identify.

Liquidity quality

weight 14% · risk 51/100
  • Roughly $93k of value is locked in this pool.
  • Moderate liquidity — fine for small positions, painful for large ones.
  • Almost nothing trades through this pool, so the liquidity is idle rather than working.

LP distribution

weight 16% · risk 49/100
  • The largest liquidity provider controls 50.2% of the pool, the top five control 62.3%.
  • 524 addresses hold LP tokens.
  • A broad set of providers makes a sudden liquidity exit far less likely.
  • One provider can exit and drain most of the liquidity without warning.

Track record & longevity

weight 13% · risk 0/100
  • Pool has existed for about 570 days.
  • A long, continuous history is a meaningful positive signal.

Verification & signals

weight 7% · risk 32/100
  • xgreen.energy is published on-ledger and can be cross-checked against the project's xrp-ledger.toml.

Risk history & behaviour

weight 6% · risk 18/100
  • The pool charges an unusually high trading fee, which eats into every swap you make.

Pair / impermanent loss

weight 3% · risk 70/100
  • A volatile token paired with XRP: large price moves in either direction cause impermanent loss.

Impermanent loss & slippage calculator

Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.

Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.

Historical fee income of 0.21% divided by this pool's ×1.8 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of -5.60%. Based on past volume, not a projection.

At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $0 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly $57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.

Estimated price impact: 2.10%

Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.

Where to go next

Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.