SOLO/XRP
84safety: ExcellentAMM account rMEJo9…wngo · issuer rsoLo2…rLZz · sologenic.com
No red flags detected from the data we have. That is not the same as safe.
Inside the SOLO/XRP pool
The SOLO/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding SOLO against XRP at the AMM account rMEJo9H5…wngo. It currently holds $59.3k of liquidity (about 43.3K XRP across both sides) and charges a 0.766% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 904 days.
Our scoring reads as a strong pool, with dependable depth and steady trading, producing a health score of 68/100, while the underlying SOLO issuer carries a safety score of 84/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.
Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $2.3k across 157 swaps, a turnover of 4.0% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 2.98% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 850 providers, with the largest holding 6.1% of the LP tokens.
Why this score?
This pool reads excellent on safety (84/100) and healthy on health (68/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.
Pool health — 68/100 · Healthy
Strongest area: lp distribution. Weakest: structural resilience.
- Liquidity depth & stability53
- Organic trading activity36
- LP distribution100
- Asset quality86
- Age & track record100
- Fee sustainability79
- Volatility / IL risk64
- Structural resilience37
What helps this score
- +Liquidity has held steady, with no large withdrawals in the tracked window.
- +Trades nearly every day — activity looks organic, not a one-off spike.
- +Liquidity is spread across many wallets, with no single dominant provider.
- +The paired token itself scores well on issuer safety.
- +Has survived more than six months on the ledger.
- +The issuer is blackholed — supply and settings are locked forever.
- +Freeze is permanently disabled, so your LP position cannot be frozen.
- +The issuer's domain maps to a publicly known operator.
- +No single liquidity provider dominates the pool.
What holds it down
- −Volume is dominated by isolated spikes rather than steady flow.
Earnings activity
Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.
Est. fee APY (7D)
2.98%
(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1
Est. fee APY (24H)
11.70%
Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.
Turnover (24h)
4.0%
Activity
A little trading: some daily volume, but thin and easily disrupted.
Recent daily volume
Last 15 days
Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.
Fee income breakdown
- 24h volume
- $2.3k
- Fee rate
- 0.766%
- Fees to LPs (24h)
- $18
- Fees to LPs (7d)
- $33
Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.
Pool size
$59.3k
24h volume
$2.3k
24h volume / size
4.0%
Trading fee
0.766%
Top LP share
6.1%
Pool age
904 days
Score breakdown
Issuer control
weight 26% · risk 12/100- Issuer is blackholed — no new tokens can be minted and settings cannot be changed.
- Freeze is permanently disabled — trust lines cannot be frozen.
Issuer quality & transparency
weight 15% · risk 15/100- The issuing account publishes sologenic.com, a domain belonging to Sologenic.
Liquidity quality
weight 14% · risk 48/100- Roughly $59k of value is locked in this pool.
- Moderate liquidity — fine for small positions, painful for large ones.
LP distribution
weight 16% · risk 6/100- The largest liquidity provider controls 6.1% of the pool, the top five control 22.3%.
- 850 addresses hold LP tokens.
- A broad set of providers makes a sudden liquidity exit far less likely.
- Liquidity is well spread across providers.
Track record & longevity
weight 13% · risk 0/100- Pool has existed for about 904 days.
- A long, continuous history is a meaningful positive signal.
Verification & signals
weight 7% · risk 6/100- sologenic.com maps to a publicly known operator and can be cross-checked against its xrp-ledger.toml.
Risk history & behaviour
weight 6% · risk 8/100- No aggressive issuer powers remain, and none have been used.
Pair / impermanent loss
weight 3% · risk 70/100- A volatile token paired with XRP: large price moves in either direction cause impermanent loss.
Impermanent loss & slippage calculator
Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.
Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.
Historical fee income of 2.98% divided by this pool's ×1 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of -2.73%. Based on past volume, not a projection.
At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $0 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly −$57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.
Estimated price impact: 3.26%
Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.
Where to go next
Impermanent loss, worked
Three scenarios showing what a 25%, 100% and 300% price move actually costs.
Open →How AMM pools pay
Fees, depth, turnover and what separates a healthy pool from a fragile one.
Open →Check the token first
Look up SOLO's issuer permissions and supply concentration before providing liquidity.
Open →Compare all pools
Health scores, fee income and LP concentration across every XRP-paired AMM we track.
Open →Learning path
Stage ten covers AMM pools step by step, with the checks to run before depositing.
Open →CampXRP blog
Written guides on tokens, liquidity pools, risk and security.
Open →Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.