← All pools

bull/XRP

BULL50safety: Moderate

AMM account rHFofS…YSrG · issuer rwxrCZ…AhvJ

No published domainrisk multiplier ×1.2

The issuer publishes no website on-ledger, so its identity cannot be verified at all.

Dominant LPrisk multiplier ×1.8

A single provider holds more than 40% of the pool and can exit at any time.

Inside the bull/XRP pool

The bull/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding bull against XRP at the AMM account rHFofSpD…YSrG. It currently holds $61.6k of liquidity (about 44.9K XRP across both sides) and charges a 1.000% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 687 days.

Our scoring reads as fair: it functions, but the numbers behind it are modest enough that exits can be slow, producing a health score of 49/100, while the underlying bull issuer carries a safety score of 50/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.

Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $96 across 92 swaps, a turnover of 0.2% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 0.19% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 4 providers, with the largest holding 100.0% of the LP tokens — if that provider withdraws, the depth you see today largely disappears.

Why this score?

This pool reads moderate on safety (50/100) and low on health (49/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.

Pool health — 49/100 · Low

Strongest area: liquidity depth & stability. Weakest: lp distribution.

  • Liquidity depth & stability64
  • Organic trading activity46
  • LP distribution9
  • Asset quality58
  • Age & track record97
  • Fee sustainability71
  • Volatility / IL risk64
  • Structural resilience48

What helps this score

  • +Liquidity has held steady, with no large withdrawals in the tracked window.
  • +Trades nearly every day — activity looks organic, not a one-off spike.
  • +Has survived more than six months on the ledger.
  • +The issuer is blackholed — supply and settings are locked forever.
  • +Freeze is permanently disabled, so your LP position cannot be frozen.
  • +A long, continuous pool history with no break in liquidity.

What holds it down

  • One provider holds almost the entire pool and can withdraw it at will.
  • No domain is published, so the issuer is fully opaque.
  • One provider holds 100% of the pool and can exit at will.

Earnings activity

Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.

Est. fee APY (7D)

0.19%

(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1

Est. fee APY (24H)

0.57%

Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.

Turnover (24h)

0.2%

Activity

LowRising

A little trading: some daily volume, but thin and easily disrupted.

Recent daily volume

Last 15 days

15 days agotoday

Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.

Fee income breakdown

24h volume
$96
Fee rate
1.000%
Fees to LPs (24h)
$1
Fees to LPs (7d)
$2

Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.

Pool size

$61.6k

24h volume

$96

24h volume / size

0.2%

Trading fee

1.000%

Top LP share

100.0%

Pool age

687 days

Score breakdown

Issuer control

weight 26% · risk 12/100
  • Issuer is blackholed — no new tokens can be minted and settings cannot be changed.
  • The issuing key is burned, so no freeze can ever be signed.

Issuer quality & transparency

weight 15% · risk 88/100
  • The issuer publishes no domain at all — completely opaque identity.

Liquidity quality

weight 14% · risk 56/100
  • Roughly $62k of value is locked in this pool.
  • Moderate liquidity — fine for small positions, painful for large ones.
  • Almost nothing trades through this pool, so the liquidity is idle rather than working.

LP distribution

weight 16% · risk 100/100
  • The largest liquidity provider controls 100.0% of the pool, the top five control 100.0%.
  • 4 addresses hold LP tokens.
  • One provider can exit and drain most of the liquidity without warning.

Track record & longevity

weight 13% · risk 0/100
  • Pool has existed for about 687 days.
  • A long, continuous history is a meaningful positive signal.

Verification & signals

weight 7% · risk 92/100
  • Nothing is published on-ledger that could be verified against a website.

Risk history & behaviour

weight 6% · risk 18/100
  • The pool charges an unusually high trading fee, which eats into every swap you make.

Pair / impermanent loss

weight 3% · risk 70/100
  • A volatile token paired with XRP: large price moves in either direction cause impermanent loss.
  • Unidentified tokens tend to be the most volatile of all.

Impermanent loss & slippage calculator

Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.

Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.

Historical fee income of 0.19% divided by this pool's ×2.16 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of -5.63%. Based on past volume, not a projection.

At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $0 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly $57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.

Estimated price impact: 3.14%

Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.

Where to go next

Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.