WLBN/XRP
50safety: ModerateAMM account rEco9A…uhzj · issuer rDJz8W…SkR5 · wellbian.io
Under $50k locked: high slippage on entry and exit.
A single provider holds more than 40% of the pool and can exit at any time.
Created less than 30 days ago, with no track record.
Inside the WLBN/XRP pool
The WLBN/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding WLBN against XRP at the AMM account rEco9AzN…uhzj. It currently holds $33.9k of liquidity (about 24.6K XRP across both sides) and charges a 0.500% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 1 days.
Our scoring reads as fair: it functions, but the numbers behind it are modest enough that exits can be slow, producing a health score of 38/100, while the underlying WLBN issuer carries a safety score of 50/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.
Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $22.0k across 231 swaps, a turnover of 64.9% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 206.07% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 1 providers, with the largest holding 100.0% of the LP tokens — if that provider withdraws, the depth you see today largely disappears.
Why this score?
This pool reads moderate on safety (50/100) and low on health (38/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.
Pool health — 38/100 · Low
Strongest area: organic trading activity. Weakest: lp distribution.
- Liquidity depth & stability45
- Organic trading activity91
- LP distribution0
- Asset quality58
- Age & track record1
- Fee sustainability75
- Volatility / IL risk52
- Structural resilience25
What helps this score
- +Healthy turnover backed by a real number of separate swaps.
- +The issuer is blackholed — supply and settings are locked forever.
- +Freeze is permanently disabled, so your LP position cannot be frozen.
What holds it down
- −One provider holds almost the entire pool and can withdraw it at will.
- −Brand-new pool with no track record to judge.
- −Headline fee APY is implausibly high — treat it as noise, not a return.
- −Under $50k of liquidity: slippage on entry and exit is high.
- −One provider holds 100% of the pool and can exit at will.
- −The pool is less than a month old, with no track record.
Earnings activity
Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.
Est. fee APY (7D)
206.07%
(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1
Est. fee APY (24H)
226.08%
Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.
Turnover (24h)
64.9%
Activity
Busy: substantial dollar volume backed by a real number of swaps.
Recent daily volume
Last 15 days
Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.
Fee income breakdown
- 24h volume
- $22.0k
- Fee rate
- 0.500%
- Fees to LPs (24h)
- $110
- Fees to LPs (7d)
- $208
Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.
Pool size
$33.9k
24h volume
$22.0k
24h volume / size
64.9%
Trading fee
0.500%
Top LP share
100.0%
Pool age
1 days
Score breakdown
Issuer control
weight 26% · risk 12/100- Issuer is blackholed — no new tokens can be minted and settings cannot be changed.
- Freeze is permanently disabled — trust lines cannot be frozen.
Issuer quality & transparency
weight 15% · risk 42/100- The issuer publishes wellbian.io, which looks project-owned but belongs to a team we cannot independently identify.
Liquidity quality
weight 14% · risk 48/100- Roughly $34k of value is locked in this pool.
- Thin liquidity: even a modest trade moves the price a lot, and exiting is costly.
- Volume is a healthy fraction of the pool's size — the liquidity is genuinely being used.
LP distribution
weight 16% · risk 100/100- The largest liquidity provider controls 100.0% of the pool, the top five control 100.0%.
- 1 address hold LP tokens.
- With this few providers, one withdrawal removes most of the market.
- One provider can exit and drain most of the liquidity without warning.
Track record & longevity
weight 13% · risk 100/100- Pool has existed for about 1 day.
- Brand new pools have no track record and are the most common setting for rug pulls.
Verification & signals
weight 7% · risk 32/100- wellbian.io is published on-ledger and can be cross-checked against the project's xrp-ledger.toml.
Risk history & behaviour
weight 6% · risk 8/100- No aggressive issuer powers remain, and none have been used.
Pair / impermanent loss
weight 3% · risk 70/100- A volatile token paired with XRP: large price moves in either direction cause impermanent loss.
Impermanent loss & slippage calculator
Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.
Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.
Historical fee income of 206.07% divided by this pool's ×5.4 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of 32.44%. Based on past volume, not a projection.
At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $3 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly −$57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.
Estimated price impact: 5.58%
Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.
Where to go next
Impermanent loss, worked
Three scenarios showing what a 25%, 100% and 300% price move actually costs.
Open →How AMM pools pay
Fees, depth, turnover and what separates a healthy pool from a fragile one.
Open →Check the token first
Look up WLBN's issuer permissions and supply concentration before providing liquidity.
Open →Compare all pools
Health scores, fee income and LP concentration across every XRP-paired AMM we track.
Open →Learning path
Stage ten covers AMM pools step by step, with the checks to run before depositing.
Open →CampXRP blog
Written guides on tokens, liquidity pools, risk and security.
Open →Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.