FLR/XRP
Flare Spark45safety: RiskyAMM account r9ZKrN…ifGY · issuer rcxJwV…o1Eu
The issuer still controls the token account and can mint more supply or change its settings.
Trust lines can be frozen by the issuer, which also freezes your LP position.
The issuer publishes no website on-ledger, so its identity cannot be verified at all.
Inside the FLR/XRP pool
The FLR/XRP pool is an XRP Ledger automated market maker holding FLR against XRP at the AMM account r9ZKrNu1…ifGY. It currently holds $131.6k of liquidity (about 96.0K XRP across both sides) and charges a 1.000% trading fee, which is paid to liquidity providers rather than to any company. It has existed for roughly 904 days.
Our scoring reads as fair: it functions, but the numbers behind it are modest enough that exits can be slow, producing a health score of 42/100, while the underlying FLR issuer carries a safety score of 45/100. Those two numbers answer different questions: health asks whether the pool works as a market, and safety asks whether the token inside it can be frozen, clawed back or reissued.
Over the last 24 hours the pool traded $273 across 4 swaps, a turnover of 0.2% of its own size. At that pace, fee income annualises to roughly 2.50% before any impermanent loss — a description of past volume, not a promised yield. Liquidity comes from 307 providers, with the largest holding 20.7% of the LP tokens.
Why this score?
This pool reads risky on safety (45/100) and low on health (42/100). Open the breakdown to see, in plain English, exactly what moved each number.
Pool health — 42/100 · Low
Health is capped by unresolved red flags on this pool.
- Liquidity depth & stability71
- Organic trading activity21
- LP distribution86
- Asset quality53
- Age & track record100
- Fee sustainability78
- Volatility / IL risk64
- Structural resilience73
What helps this score
- +Liquidity has held steady, with no large withdrawals in the tracked window.
- +Trades nearly every day — activity looks organic, not a one-off spike.
- +Liquidity is spread across many wallets, with no single dominant provider.
- +Has survived more than six months on the ledger.
- +A long, continuous pool history with no break in liquidity.
What holds it down
- −1 unresolved critical red flag caps how healthy this pool can read.
- −Volume is dominated by isolated spikes rather than steady flow.
- −The issuer is not blackholed and can still mint supply or change settings.
- −No domain is published, so the issuer is fully opaque.
Earnings activity
Historical trading activity in this pool. These figures describe what already happened — they are not a forecast or a yield promise.
Est. fee APY (7D)
2.50%
(1 + (7-day average daily volume × fee rate ÷ current TVL)) ^ 365 − 1
Est. fee APY (24H)
0.76%
Yesterday alone — far noisier than the 7-day figure.
Turnover (24h)
0.2%
Activity
Almost nothing traded here in the last day — fee income is near zero.
Recent daily volume
Last 15 days
Each bar is one calendar day of traded volume. Days we hold no snapshot for show as zero.
Fee income breakdown
- 24h volume
- $273
- Fee rate
- 1.000%
- Fees to LPs (24h)
- $3
- Fees to LPs (7d)
- $62
Calculated from historical on-chain trade volume. Fee income is shared across all liquidity providers in proportion to their share and changes with volume. Past volume does not predict future volume.
Pool size
$131.6k
24h volume
$273
24h volume / size
0.2%
Trading fee
1.000%
Top LP share
20.7%
Pool age
904 days
Score breakdown
Issuer control
weight 26% · risk 76/100- Issuer account is still controlled by its owner: supply and settings can change at any time.
- Issuer can freeze trust lines. A freeze also freezes the matching LP tokens.
Issuer quality & transparency
weight 15% · risk 88/100- The issuer publishes no domain at all — completely opaque identity.
Liquidity quality
weight 14% · risk 47/100- Roughly $132k of value is locked in this pool.
- Moderate liquidity — fine for small positions, painful for large ones.
- Almost nothing trades through this pool, so the liquidity is idle rather than working.
LP distribution
weight 16% · risk 30/100- The largest liquidity provider controls 20.7% of the pool, the top five control 68.5%.
- 307 addresses hold LP tokens.
- A broad set of providers makes a sudden liquidity exit far less likely.
Track record & longevity
weight 13% · risk 0/100- Pool has existed for about 904 days.
- A long, continuous history is a meaningful positive signal.
Verification & signals
weight 7% · risk 92/100- Nothing is published on-ledger that could be verified against a website.
Risk history & behaviour
weight 6% · risk 30/100- Freeze has not been given up, so the power is available even though it has not been used.
- The pool charges an unusually high trading fee, which eats into every swap you make.
Pair / impermanent loss
weight 3% · risk 70/100- A volatile token paired with XRP: large price moves in either direction cause impermanent loss.
- Unidentified tokens tend to be the most volatile of all.
Impermanent loss & slippage calculator
Move the sliders to see what happens to a position in this pool.
Impermanent loss: 5.72% versus simply holding both assets.
Historical fee income of 2.50% divided by this pool's ×3.9 red-flag multiplier, minus that loss, gives a risk-adjusted result of -5.08%. Based on past volume, not a projection.
At the last 24 hours of volume that stake would have earned about $0 in fees, while the price move above implies roughly −$57 of impermanent loss versus just holding.
Estimated price impact: 1.50%
Constant-product estimate against this pool's current size, before fees.
Where to go next
Impermanent loss, worked
Three scenarios showing what a 25%, 100% and 300% price move actually costs.
Open →How AMM pools pay
Fees, depth, turnover and what separates a healthy pool from a fragile one.
Open →Check the token first
Look up FLR's issuer permissions and supply concentration before providing liquidity.
Open →Compare all pools
Health scores, fee income and LP concentration across every XRP-paired AMM we track.
Open →Learning path
Stage ten covers AMM pools step by step, with the checks to run before depositing.
Open →CampXRP blog
Written guides on tokens, liquidity pools, risk and security.
Open →Data is read from the public XRP Ledger and refreshed periodically; issuer settings and balances can change at any moment. This is educational information, not financial advice.